AuDHD Test

Adult Autism Screening Test

A quick, validated screening for autism traits in adults.

This screening uses the AQ-10 (Autism Spectrum Quotient — 10 Items), developed by the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge University. It has 88% sensitivity and 91% specificity, making it one of the most reliable brief autism screening tools.

10 questions — takes about 2 minutes

About the AQ-10 Autism Screening

The AQ-10 was developed by the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge University as a brief autism screening tool for adults.

Derived from the full 50-item Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-50) by Baron-Cohen et al. (2001), the AQ-10 was validated by Allison et al. (2012) and identifies the 10 questions most predictive of autism spectrum conditions. It achieves 88% sensitivity and 91% specificity, making it suitable as a first-line screening instrument. The AQ-10 is recommended by NICE clinical guidelines for use when autism is suspected in adults.

How AQ-10 Scoring Works

The AQ-10 uses binary scoring — each question contributes either 0 or 1 point.

For questions 1, 7, 8, and 10, answering 'Definitely Agree' or 'Slightly Agree' scores 1 point (these describe autistic traits). For the remaining questions (2-6, 9), answering 'Definitely Disagree' or 'Slightly Disagree' scores 1 point (these describe neurotypical traits, so disagreeing suggests autistic traits). Total score ranges from 0 to 10.

A score of 6 or above suggests elevated autistic traits and warrants further assessment. However, many autistic adults — particularly women and those who have developed strong masking strategies — may score below threshold on brief screening tools.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between AQ-10 and AQ-50?
The AQ-50 is the full Autism Spectrum Quotient developed by Baron-Cohen et al. in 2001, containing 50 questions across five domains: social skills, attention switching, attention to detail, communication, and imagination. The AQ-10 is a brief version that distills these into the 10 most predictive questions. While the AQ-50 provides a more detailed trait profile, the AQ-10 is preferred as a quick first-line screening — it takes just 2 minutes and maintains strong sensitivity (88%) and specificity (91%) for identifying individuals who warrant further evaluation.
Why might women score lower on the AQ-10?
Research consistently shows that autistic women tend to score lower on autism screening tools due to camouflaging — the conscious or unconscious effort to mask autistic traits in social situations. Women are often socialized to be more attuned to social expectations and may develop compensatory strategies from an early age. This can result in screening scores that underestimate their true level of autistic traits. If you suspect masking might be affecting your results, consider taking our CAT-Q camouflaging assessment (/cat-q) to measure your masking behaviors.
What is masking or camouflaging?
Masking (also called camouflaging) refers to the strategies autistic people use to hide their autistic traits and appear neurotypical in social situations. This can include rehearsing conversations, mimicking others' facial expressions, suppressing stimming behaviors, and forcing eye contact. While masking can help with social acceptance, it comes at a significant cost — often leading to exhaustion, burnout, anxiety, and loss of identity. You can measure your own camouflaging behaviors with our CAT-Q assessment (/cat-q).
Is there a more thorough autism screening available?
Yes, the RAADS-R (Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale — Revised) is a comprehensive 80-question autism screening that evaluates traits across four dimensions: social relatedness, circumscribed interests, language, and sensory motor. Unlike the AQ-10's snapshot approach, the RAADS-R also captures developmental history by asking whether traits have been present since childhood, only now, or both. If you want a more detailed picture of your autism traits, our RAADS-R assessment (/raads-r) provides dimensional scores and greater clinical depth.
Can adults be diagnosed with autism later in life?
Absolutely. Late diagnosis of autism in adulthood is increasingly common and recognized. Many adults — particularly women, people of color, and those with high masking abilities — were missed as children because diagnostic criteria historically focused on young white males. Late diagnosis can be profoundly validating, helping people understand lifelong patterns of social difficulty, sensory sensitivity, and burnout. If you suspect you may be autistic, seeking evaluation from a clinician experienced in adult autism diagnosis is a worthwhile step regardless of your age.
What are the limitations of the AQ-10?
The AQ-10 has several known limitations. Its brevity means it captures a limited range of autistic traits and cannot assess severity across different domains. It was primarily validated in Western populations, so cultural factors may influence responses. The binary scoring system loses nuance compared to dimensional measures. Perhaps most importantly, it tends to underidentify autism in women and individuals who camouflage — their learned social behaviors can mask the very traits the questions assess.
How do AQ-10 and RAADS-R complement each other?
The AQ-10 and RAADS-R serve different but complementary roles. The AQ-10 is ideal as a quick first-line screening — just 10 questions to identify whether further evaluation is warranted. The RAADS-R (/raads-r) provides a much deeper assessment with 80 questions spanning four dimensions and a developmental perspective. Using both gives you a brief initial indicator plus a comprehensive trait profile. If your AQ-10 score is borderline or you suspect masking is a factor, the RAADS-R can reveal patterns the brief screening misses.
What should I discuss with my doctor after this screening?
Bring your screening results and be prepared to discuss specific areas of difficulty — social communication challenges, sensory sensitivities, need for routine, intense interests, and how these affect your daily life. Share your developmental history: were you a 'different' child? Mention any compensatory strategies you use. Ask for a referral to a clinician experienced in adult autism assessment, as many general practitioners have limited training in this area. It can also help to keep a diary of situations where you notice autistic traits in the week before your appointment.

References

Allison, C., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Toward brief 'Red Flags' for autism screening. JAACAP, 51(2), 202-212.

Booth, T., Murray, A.L., McKenzie, K., et al. (2013). An Evaluation of the AQ-10. JADD, 43(8), 1907-1910.

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., et al. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ). JADD, 31(1), 5-17.

Hoekstra, R.A., Vinkhuyzen, A.A., et al. (2011). The Construction and Validation of an AQ Short Form. JADD, 41(5), 589-596.

National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). Autism Spectrum Disorder.